Shruti KaushikLogistics software companies check AI drafts by saving coverage by country, how on-time and ETA accuracy are measured, emissions calculation methods and the basis for cost savings. Marketing, tenders and sales emails are then run through a claim check that flags delivery, coverage, sustainability and savings claims the record cannot back.
Where AI drafts go wrong for logistics software companies
Logistics buyers evaluate on measurable service: on-time delivery, ETA accuracy, coverage and cost per shipment. Each depends on a definition. On-time to the promised date or the requested date? ETA error measured at what point? Assistants write the headline version and leave out the definition.
Sustainability claims are the more exposed category. The FTC's Green Guides set out how marketers should qualify environmental claims such as carbon neutral, and "carbon neutral shipping" or "cut emissions by 20%" are statements a model writes easily. A shipper that repeats them in its own reporting inherits the risk.
Claims an AI draft might invent for logistics software companies
These examples are invented for this page to show the pattern. They describe no real company, customer or result.
- "99% on-time delivery" with no definition.
- "Real-time tracking in 190 countries" when coverage varies by carrier.
- "Cut freight costs by 18%" with no baseline.
- "Carbon neutral shipping" with no offset or method on file.
- "Network of 10,000 carriers" when the count is lower or counts something else.
The facts logistics software companies would save once
A saved fact is one sentence you can stand behind, with its source and date. Anything a draft claims that matches none of them is flagged.
- Coverage by country and mode, and where it depends on a partner.
- On-time and ETA metrics: definition, period, population.
- Cost savings: baseline, customer, period.
- Emissions calculation method and any offset arrangements.
- Integrations with transport and ERP systems.
- Customs and compliance features, and their limits.
The workflow
- Save coverage, metric definitions and emissions methods, with an owner in operations.
- Draft tender responses, web copy and emails in your assistant.
- Run the claim check. Paste the tender question as source text, so each answer is held to it.
- Send flagged sustainability claims to the sustainability lead for sign-off by private link.
- Submit, and keep the approval record with the tender.
The method is the one on the draft fact check page: Klype extracts the figures, guarantees, vague authority and stories in a draft, matches each to your saved facts and any source text you paste, flags what it cannot back, and keeps an approval record. It is rule-based, so the same text gets the same answer, and it never publishes or sends anything.
Sign up: your first GTM plan is free
The 7-day trial needs no card. Prefer to talk it through for your team first? Use the contact form below.
What the check does not do
It compares claims with the facts you saved and any source text you paste. It does not browse the web, does not verify outside claims and does not replace legal, compliance or editorial review where your work needs it. When it finds nothing checkable, it says nothing was verified, so you still read every draft before it goes out.
Sources
Each source is cited for the single point made above. Klype does not give legal advice; ask your counsel how any rule applies to you.
Common questions
Does the check calculate emissions?
No. It checks that a stated figure matches the figure and method you saved.
Can it handle long tenders?
Run the tender in sections. Each answer's claims are checked against saved facts.
Why mention the Green Guides?
Because they are the FTC's reference on environmental marketing claims. Counsel advises how they apply to you.
Where to go next
Read how the check works on the draft fact check page, or try the free post checker without signing up. Related guides: Klype for proptech companies, Klype for martech companies, and Klype for devtools companies. The full list is on the hub.