Shruti KaushikUsing AI for LinkedIn posts goes wrong in role-specific ways: founders get invented customers, lawyers get advice they cannot give, financial advisors get return promises, engineers get markdown asterisks. These twenty guides cover what changes for each role, five topic angles, the compliance limits where they apply, and a 120-to-180-word sample post written for the page with no figures and no client names, along with its real score in the free checker.
How each guide is built
Every page follows the same shape. What changes when someone in that role posts: the topics readers expect, the proof they will accept, and the compliance limits where they apply, which for lawyers, doctors and financial advisors are strict. Five topic angles you could write this week. One sample post of 120 to 180 words, written for the page with no figures and no named clients, so you can see the shape without copying the content. And the sample's real result from the free post checker: every sample on this hub scored 100 with nothing to fix, and each page links to the checker with the sample loaded so you can see the rules it passed.
The guides are written for people who use AI to draft and then publish under their own name. The advice is the same throughout: feed the tool decisions you actually made, keep every figure sourced or cut it, keep clients and patients unidentifiable, and check the draft before it goes out. The tool used for checking is free; the drafting tool is yours to choose.
The twenty roles
Where to go next
If your role is not here, the fifteen patterns that make a post read as AI-written apply to everyone, and the checker runs them on any draft. The free tools measure your voice and turn a rough thought into a draft. Klype's 7-day trial adds a shared record of your product and buyer, drafts held to your measured voice, and a check on every draft before it goes out, at $39 a month after the trial.
Common questions
Is it okay to use AI for LinkedIn posts in a regulated profession?
Yes, if you treat the draft as raw material and apply your profession's rules yourself: no advice to individuals, no client or patient detail, no claims your regulator prohibits, and compliance review where your firm requires it. The guides for lawyers, doctors and financial advisors list the limits in general terms.
Were the sample posts written by AI?
They were written for these pages, by hand, with no figures and no named clients, and then run through the same fifteen rules the free checker applies in the browser. Each page shows the actual score. They are shapes to learn from, not scripts to post.
What does the checker look for?
Fifteen plain rules: cliche openers, unsourced statistics, invented stories, closing questions, hashtag blocks, em dash overuse, "not just X, it's Y", three-item lists, flat rhythm, uniform paragraphs, summary endings, universal lesson endings, enumerated lessons, markdown asterisks and vague result claims. Each has a page at klype.ai/patterns with examples and a rewrite.